Urfa Kebab vs Adana Kebab
Per 100 g, Urfa Kebab has 240 kcal while Adana Kebab has 250 kcal, so Adana Kebab is slightly more calorie-dense per 100 g and also higher in fat (20 g vs 18 g). By portion, 1 serving of Urfa Kebab (160 g) provides 384 kcal, while 1 serving (2 skewers) of Adana Kebab (150 g) provides 375 kcal; because its serving is larger, Urfa Kebab edges ahead on the total plate. Both are high-protein, low-carb grilled meats, so someone watching calories or fat may lean toward Urfa Kebab, while managing portion size keeps either balanced.
Urfa Kebab vs Adana Kebab — per 100 g
| Nutrient (100 g) | Urfa Kebab | Adana Kebab |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Protein | 17 g | 18 g |
| Carbs | 2 g | 1 g |
| Fat | 18 g | 20 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
Values are approximate, based on average recipes; they vary by brand, portion and cooking method.
For informational purposes only — not medical advice. If you have symptoms or a medical condition, consult a doctor.
Urfa Kebab and Adana Kebab are two classic Turkish minced-meat kebabs; both are built mainly from red meat and fat and are very low in carbohydrate. The main difference is a small gap in fat content: Adana Kebab tends to be slightly fattier and spicier, while Urfa Kebab is a similar but marginally leaner alternative.
On a 100 g basis: Urfa Kebab has 240 kcal, 17 g protein, 2 g carbs, 18 g fat and 0 g fiber. Adana Kebab has 250 kcal, 18 g protein, 1 g carbs, 20 g fat and 0 g fiber. As you can see, calories and fat are higher in Adana Kebab, while carbs are marginally higher in Urfa Kebab.
Which is denser per 100 g?
In a 100 g comparison, Adana Kebab at 250 kcal sits slightly above Urfa Kebab at 240 kcal. The main driver of this gap is fat: Adana Kebab carries 20 g of fat per 100 g versus 18 g in Urfa Kebab. Carbohydrate is very low in both (Urfa Kebab 2 g, Adana Kebab 1 g), so fat content is the deciding factor for calories. Both are protein-rich (Urfa Kebab 17 g, Adana Kebab 18 g).
How big is the portion difference?
On a real plate, serving size matters. 1 serving of Urfa Kebab weighs about 160 g and holds 384 kcal, while 1 serving (2 skewers) of Adana Kebab is 150 g and provides 375 kcal. Even though Adana Kebab is more calorie-dense per 100 g, Urfa Kebab's larger portion means it edges ahead at 384 kcal for the whole serving. So which one adds more calories to the plate depends on the grams served.
Which for dieting or weight management?
If you want to keep calories and fat a touch lower, Urfa Kebab is marginally the lighter choice at 240 kcal and 18 g fat per 100 g. Adana Kebab stays a little denser at 250 kcal and 20 g fat. Both are high in protein, so they help with satiety; for weight management the real levers are portion size and the sides such as bread, rice or lavash served alongside. Weighing the portion and adding plenty of greens can turn either kebab into a balanced meal. This is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Frequently asked
Which has more calories, Urfa Kebab or Adana Kebab?
Per 100 g, Adana Kebab (250 kcal) is slightly more caloric than Urfa Kebab (240 kcal). By portion, however, 1 serving of Urfa Kebab is 384 kcal and 1 serving (2 skewers) of Adana Kebab is 375 kcal, so the ranking can change with serving size.
Which is fattier?
Adana Kebab is fattier at 20 g of fat per 100 g versus 18 g in Urfa Kebab. Both are very low in carbohydrate (Urfa Kebab 2 g, Adana Kebab 1 g) and high in protein.
Which should I choose on a diet?
Someone cutting calories and fat a bit may pick Urfa Kebab (240 kcal/100 g), while someone wanting a richer, fattier profile may pick Adana Kebab (250 kcal/100 g); controlling the portion matters most. This is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Individual values
A healthier life starts with one photo.
Snap your meal; CaloriPanda names the dish and puts calories and macros in front of you in seconds — calorie tracking that knows every cuisine, right in your pocket.
